FTC sues AmeriDebt
The Associated Press
WASHINGTON — The government is suing one of the largest credit counseling companies, charging Wednesday that AmeriDebt used deceptive marketing to bilk hundreds of thousands of people.
AmeriDebt touts itself as “the friend of consumers in crisis,” but the Federal Trade Commission alleged the company hid fees and did not educate people about how to get out of debt.
The FTC, which filed the lawsuit in federal court, also claimed the Germantown, Md.-based company falsely described itself as a nonprofit organization.
“We will not allow consumers to be duped into ‘contributing’ hundreds of dollars to these so-called ‘nonprofits,’” Howard Beales, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, said in a statement. “There was nothing voluntary and nothing charitable about these payments. Consumers’ money didn’t go to creditors. It just ended up lining the pockets of the defendants.”
AmeriDebt would not comment on the lawsuit. But on Tuesday it issued a statement saying it expected the FTC to take legal action. AmeriDebt attorney Zynda Sellers said the company looked forward to telling its side of the story.
With personal bankruptcies surging to record levels, there is a deep pool of customers for consumer counseling companies.
Complaints against such companies are increasing, according to Edward Johnson, president and chief executive of the Better Business Bureau-Washington D.C. In 1998, 237 complaints were filed nationwide. Last year, complaints grew to 1,480, with the largest percentage naming AmeriDebt.
Consumer groups hailed the FTC’s lawsuit.
“We applaud this action because there are entirely too many aggressive for-profit companies that are masquerading as charitable nonprofit credit counselors,” said Travis Plunkett, legislative director at the Consumer Federation of America. “AmeriDebt has become the symbol of bad credit counseling in this country, but they are by no means the only shady operators.”
In its complaint, the FTC charged that AmeriDebt does not operate for charitable purposes, but instead works to make money for affiliated for-profit companies. The agency said the company charges upfront fees to enroll consumers in debt-management plans, even though it advertises no such initial costs.